welcome back, my baby mobile!
today and I completely believe that I really destined Sansei phone, missing a full 24 hours of moto two o lock in the afternoon back to my hands! Yesterday, too careless of their own actually forgotten it in the bicycle basket inside the car, but fortunately learned Seoul sister picked up the security of homes it, so this afternoon my moto can once again feel the warmth in my hands 
calm mood, sitting again tonight Documentation Centre to enjoy the taste of good books to me. After the first day of National Day LJ I recommend a book written by Wang Dingding, “institutional analysis notes,” very grateful to LJ, because the feeling has been a long time did not allow me to find a good book so fascinated the focus. Carrefour began in the following McDonald to get this book just because it is Wang Dingding words were attracted, but an hour later sat down to see the documentation center on the fifth page to find a long-lost feeling of intimacy . Economics from the University began to look after the little book with my instinct to find a way of thinking have so many good books resonate. Here what I call good books seems very subjective standard, but the effectiveness of this resonance gives me far more than the book value of the knowledge can give me. Many feel a lot of ideas in the book mentioned in the head before I read there are some vague outline, but the biggest benefit is that the book helped me to clean up these very vague concept more clearly marked out of a structure, and I appreciate Wang Dingding shown in the book, the vast body of knowledge. Because it is something in the discussion of institutional economics, it involves many aspects, history, religion, philosophy, behavioral science, anthropology, just seems very complicated very broad, but in this book, citing Wang Dingding, both ways, gives a very comprehensive enjoy the feeling. And appreciate the book some of the words in the sentence. In reading these paragraphs, is a very easy and very cost God thing, because in sympathy with the author felt joy at the same time, there are more ideas and questions came out. Under the mask example
sermon in the book “triple transformation —– cultural, social, political — determines the characteristics of Chinese society, or” unique “。。。。。。 What is the Chinese character to say, I think, most Russian with Chinese characteristics is caused by the triple transformation of all behavior…. The more intense social transformation, its members also more short-sighted eyes, which is entirely rational behavior ,。。。。。。 corruption, intense behavioral characteristics of societies in transition. “(Abstract to” system analysis based notes, “the third page)
on reading this paragraph, think Wang Dingding from the historical and sociological point of view to see the current so-called “Chinese characteristics” of the source. I agree with this point of view see the answer. Because China is experiencing the unique history and a firm decision on the reform of social change as a rational person (self-interest for the last) in the future is extremely uncertain (including income, pension, medical and other basic living security of uncertainty), under the conditions there will be only a short while for the foreseeable future need for more long-term plan the future is not responsible for the short-term behavior. However, I still hold to the view of Wang Dingding reservations, because these short-term behavior can be used in addition to the uncertainty of interpretation, there are some I consider very important source, such as a change in the economic base of the environment, China social moral, spiritual awareness superstructure is also synchronized with the progress? March 20 this year, the day before yesterday to see the “newsweek”, the cover portrait of Confucius attracted me, but the cover title “confucious 2.
0 ——– beijing newest weapon is an ancient
icon of authority” told me that there certainly is one pair of articles hostile to China. Sure enough, Introduction “Beijing is hoping a return to Confucian values ??
will help quell growing dissent and inspire new
loyalty” points directly to the author in the eyes of the United States lack the spirit of China social problems. Article, the author will be practical problems in China, such as the widening income gap, drop down to the level of belief in the moral loss, so the Government efforts to promote the use of Confucius, the Confucian spirit of trying to re-establish a new social ethics, but also of such policies validity questioned. Not discuss the feasibility of this policy, but I agree with the author questioned the reasons: changes in social environment, today China is not closed before the relative periphery of society, but a network to accept different beliefs, social consciousness of the environment . China in particular, globalization, networking can really grow a new generation of thousands of years ago the concept of identity, but still have a question. Combination of previously mentioned in the blog on the impact of Chinese ideology, I can only say that Wang Dingding may ignore the impact of awareness of people behavior. Have many times felt the power of faith, not even a lot of personal experience, but also the hero of the story have a firm conviction that impressed by the tremendous power, so even their motto is “to adhere to, to believe that” What impressed me most was to calculate the DZ I talked to one. A group of Jews, adults, women, children, in a sinking ship waiting to escape, but the problem can not be taken away only a lifeboat all people, all people are desperate to get on the lifeboat, but when a shouted an elderly “who is the future of Jew?”
crowded all the adults to stop and consciously let their kids women presented a lifeboat, I think if people who ring in China, will have such a result?
Although faith can not solve all problems, but at least in spirit level people make sense of the future and the uncertainty caused by mental emptiness. What is sacred is not love of the faith, sometimes just for reasons of conscience or intuition to judge, a conviction is sufficient to uphold and a candle in the dark specified.
write so much, perhaps the phone today to find the reason for re- ? Incomprehensible, or click on the breakfast entertainment rest. . . . . . . .